(Source: Inside Retail Asia | 11 January 2017)
Burberry Korea is under fire for cutting prices “too little, too late”.
It’s not the first time Burberry has been criticised for its Asian pricing strategy. Last May,
Jack Chuang, a partner with Hong Kong-headquartered OC&C Strategy Consultants, said that of all the luxury brands, Burberry is the one with the most significant price gap between Asian and European markets.
“Prices in Mainland China are almost 40 per cent higher than in UK, while in Hong Kong, it is 20 per cent higher.”
The South Korean office of Burberry recently marked down the price of some of its products to reflect the fallen value of the British pound, but only by a small margin compared with the currency’s depreciation, fashion industry officials said Wednesday.
Burberry Korea dropped the local price by an average 9 per cent as the pound fell after Britain’s decision to leave the European Union in June last year. Industry officials say the markdown, however, falls far short of the 17 per cent fall of the British currency against the US dollar. The pound’s exchange rate against the South Korean won dropped 17 per cent from 1765.90 won in February last year to 1468.13 won as of January 9.
The price adjustment in Korea also falls behind Burberry’s decision for Hong Kong, where the fashion brand’s product prices were taken down 10-15 per cent in September. Some of the products were down by 20 per cent. The markdown rate was more than the 9.75 per cent fall of the pound against the Hong Kong dollar at the time.
Burberry Korea declined to talk on the matter despite repeated calls by news agency Yonhap.
Consumer groups have long complained that foreign brands often take advantage of their popularity in South Korea to push demands they do not make in other countries or exclude South Korea from their market action.
Swedish furniture maker Ikea caused ire last year when it kept selling dressers in South Korea that were recalled in the US and Canada after reported accidents involving children that resulted in deaths. The company had argued that the dressers meet local safety regulations. Volkswagen, who already settled on compensation to its consumers in the US from faked emissions tests, has yet to carry out full recalls or offer compensation steps in South Korea.
US credit card company Visa in May came under fire for deciding to raise the processing fee by 10 per cent for overseas transactions, effective in South Korea but not in Japan or China.
Such discriminatory actions are more stark at duty-free shops, industry officials say, who fiercely compete to host highly sought brands.
“In case of popular brands, they often insist on excessive requirements, such as the cost of interior decorations when deciding to open their store,” an official at a Seoul duty-free shop said. “The retailers have to be compliant because of the brand power and because they have to attract customers, and they end up having to accommodate the demands.”
- Original reporting by Yonhap, via Korea Bizwire.